The Misconstrued Money Trade
In a city where the economy worked on a credit-based framework, an African man showed up with 1000 rupees close by. He moved toward the lodging counter and said, “I’m hoping to book a room.
READ IN URDU BELOW
The lodging proprietor quickly took the 1000 rupees and hurried to the individual who had left the inn, settling the bill for ghee (explained spread) by giving over similar 1000 rupees.
The ghee merchant, thusly, rushed to the milk dealer, paid him 1000 rupees, and cleared the exceptional milk bill.
The milk merchant, likewise, rushed to the steers proprietor, gave him 1000 rupees, and settled up the contribution for the milk.
The dairy cattle proprietor then ran to the one selling feed, and in the wake of paying 1000 rupees, settled the bill for the grub.
The grub vender, presently with 1000 rupees, got back to the lodging, where he utilized the cash to partake in a dinner in the café. The 1000 rupees took care of the expense of his food.
The African man returned and, expressing that he was disappointed, reclaimed his 1000 rupees, asserting he tracked down no appropriate room.
Nobody took anything, and nobody got anything. Everybody accepted the exchanges were settled.
The disarray lies in the misconception that the rupees had a place with the people in question, while, as a general rule, they were simply going through. The world just keeps what is kept as honest deeds. The rest is for the main beneficiaries.
They accompanied void hands, and with void hands, they will leave. In any case, the crate of deeds will go with them.
Generally, it’s anything but a wreck however a distortion of proprietorship. The rupees were never theirs in any case; they were just tokens going through the hands of transient spirits. The genuine cash that matters is the one put away in the container of equitable deeds.